0 ratings, login to rate

schachbjm(2329) vs. michaelogbeide(2086) *

Login to get PGN standard 45+45, 2020-12-01


schachbjm(2329) kibitzes: Good luck and have fun! ||*(
MichaelOgbeide(2086) kibitzes: thanks
1.e4 (0:00) c5 (0:00) 2.Nf3 (0:02)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: expecting an accelerated dragon
2...Nc6 (0:06) 3.d4 (0:02) cxd4 (0:05) 4.Nxd4 (0:00) g6 (0:07) 5.Nc3 (0:45) Bg7 (0:07) 6.Be3 (0:01) e6 (0:10) 7.Qd2 (0:07) Nge7 (0:03) 8.O-O-O (0:44) O-O (0:18)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: 6 ... e6 is somewhat uncommon
schachbjm(2329) whispers: I ll spend some time here, this does not look right to me how he handles the accelerated dragon
schachbjm(2329) whispers: h4-h5 and black is in huge trouble
9.h4 (2:22) d5 (0:48)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: in addition, Ndb5 is always an idea ...
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Nxc6 bxc6 (... Nxc6 drops a pawn) h5 and I do not see how black organizes counterplay in time
10.Nxc6 (2:58) bxc6 (1:07) 11.h5 (0:02)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 followed by hxg leads to mate already, just to show in how big troubles black is facing here
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Qa5 and Re8 are the only moves here to prevent me from winning the exchange (he cannot allow a trade of DSB
offtherook(2316) whispers: odd mixing of ideas by black, to play e6 and d5 in an accelerated dragon
11...Qa5 (3:30)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Bh6 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qxc3 bxc3 looks great (dominating the dark squares and blacks king is short of squares)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: but maybe there is even sth. better
12.Bh6 (2:47) Bxc3 (1:20) 13.Qxc3 (0:00) Qxc3 (0:03) 14.bxc3 (0:00) Re8 (0:03)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: e5 is appealing, making his LSB even worse. I can follow-up with Bd3 and maybe there is a good moment for hxg
15.e5 (2:01)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: given the pawn structure and the bishop pair, white should be significantly better - if not even winning already
offtherook(2316) whispers: g4 for white looks strong at some point too, black can't risk opening the file
schachbjm(2329) whispers: I can gain space with f4 and g4 whenever I want
schachbjm(2329) whispers: my king is safer than his one even though I do not have a b- nor d-pawn
schachbjm(2329) whispers: a5 Ba6 might be his best practical try, getting rid of my strong bishop pair
Bionchess(2271) whispers: White's kinside pawn could be a powerful "Armada"
15...a5 (4:09)
offtherook(2316) whispers: black found the Ba6 plan which must be his only practical chance
offtherook(2316) whispers: what about g4 Ba6 Bh3 here, to keep the bishop pair?
offtherook(2316) whispers: white could then follow with f4, possibly even f5
Bionchess(2271) whispers: trading white color Bs may not be a bad idea
blore(1914) whispers: woof
Bionchess(2271) whispers: although in end game a pair of bishops are very powerful..
offtherook(2316) whispers: my thought is that black's LSB is kinda useless and white's still has the opportunity to support a kingside pawn storm
schachbjm(2329) whispers: I do not see a good way to keep the bishop pair, so Kd2 Ba6 Bxa6 Rxa6 Rb1 is tempting. However, if there is a good way to keep the bishop pair, I will go for it
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Be2 Ba6 Bg4 is a way to keep the LSB on the board
schachbjm(2329) whispers: c4 Ba6 is the alternative
16.c4 (11:07) Ba6 (1:41) 17.Bg5 (0:50)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: I really liked c4 Bg5 when I calculated it as c4 cannot be taken here
schachbjm(2329) whispers: due to Rd7 winning a piece
Bionchess(2271) whispers: clever
schachbjm(2329) whispers: I think most lower rated players will fall for it, missing that the knight cannot move away due to hxg and blacks king is busted
schachbjm(2329) whispers: *would
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Nf5 is not possible here stepping out of the idea due to g4 and the knight has to go back
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Ra7 might be a way to cover the d7-square, but it looks quite passive
17...Ra7 (9:34) 18.Rh4 (1:08) Rb8 (4:29)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: I am not convinced that this is playable for him ...
schachbjm(2329) whispers: it looks risky that both e7 and a6 are defended by the same piece
schachbjm(2329) whispers: my first idea here was cxd followed by d6 and this protected passed pawn is nasty to deal with
schachbjm(2329) whispers: but he can prevent me from getting d6 in by just taking the pawn ...
schachbjm(2329) whispers: I have to calculate cxd Bxf1?! d6?! Nf5?! here and cxd Nxd Bxa6 Rxa6 hxg with the idea to play Rdh1 next
schachbjm(2329) whispers: cxd cxd/exd is not playable as Bxe7 Bxf1 Bd6 followed by Rxf1 wins a piece
schachbjm(2329) whispers: I just have to make the cxd Bxf1?! line to work ...
schachbjm(2329) whispers: cxd Bxf1 d6 Nf5 d7 Rxd7 Rxd7 Nxh4 Bxh4 and we end in an opposite colored bishop endgame with equal pawns (if I count them correctly)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: maybe I can move the rook from h4 ... let us say to f4
schachbjm(2329) whispers: cxd Bxf1 d6 Nf5 Rf4 Bxg2 d7 is winning even though he can block the file with Bd5 (I can promote and win the exchange)
19.cxd5 (14:14) Nxd5 (4:12) 20.Bxa6 (0:09) Rxa6 (0:03) 21.hxg6 (0:02)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: now it is over
schachbjm(2329) whispers: even though I will have to convert it
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Bxf1 was the critical line (in my humble opinion)
blore(1914) whispers: WOOF
schachbjm(2329) whispers: but never call it a win until the scoresheet is signed
blore(1914) whispers: woof
schachbjm(2329) whispers: c4 Rd7 is crushing
21...fxg6 (2:05) 22.c4 (0:03) Nc3 (0:09)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: it is just one spice check, right?
schachbjm(2329) whispers: let me double check before playing Rd7
blore(1914) whispers: woof :))
offtherook(2316) whispers: well played schach
23.Rd7 (0:53) h5 (0:12)
blore(1914) whispers: woof the position looks like a plus for white
schachbjm(2329) whispers: missed h5 as a defending ressource, but still this looks hopeless
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Rf4 is not possible due to the fork
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Bh6 Rg7+ followed by Rxg6 and Rxh5 is convincing
24.Bh6 (1:55) Rab6 (0:13)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: my king should easily escape his spice checks, nonetheless let us make sure not to blunder a perpetual
25.Rg7+ (1:11) Kh8 (0:02) 26.Rxg6 (0:02) Nxa2+ (0:03) 27.Kd2 (0:27) Rb2+ (0:57) 28.Ke3 (0:02)
schachbjm(2329) whispers: why is this game still ongoing?
schachbjm(2329) whispers: I underestimated his defending ressources
schachbjm(2329) whispers: he will run out of checks here and then his weak king will most likely collapse, but it is far away from blitzing/premoving it out
28...Kh7 (2:42) 29.Rxe6 (0:18) R8b3+ (0:07) 30.Kd4 (0:25)
blore(1922) whispers: woof
schachbjm(2329) whispers: what I totally overlooked is that I do not have any discovery after Rxh5 since all his pieces will be on light squares ...
schachbjm(2329) whispers: seems like I am too overoptimistic today
blore(1922) whispers: Rxf2 is good for Michael?!!?
schachbjm(2329) whispers: Rxf2 Rxh5 Rxg2 Rxc6 is winning, but it is not a win on the spot
schachbjm(2329) whispers: all pieces on light squares :( :( so no discovery available
offtherook(2316) whispers: Rxf2 g4 and then there is a discovery if hxg Be3+
offtherook(2316) whispers: the c6 pawn is doomed so it's fine to delay that capture and instead keep white's g4 pawn on the board
MichaelOgbeide lost connection; game adjourned *

Comments

No comments so far.

Login to add comments

Your session

You are not logged in, so you miss some site functions.
Please login.

See also how to set your password.

Watchbot

See what is WatchBot and how to use it.

Do you like it? Read how can you help.

Quick search

Related games

Loading....

See also games by schachbjm or by michaelogbeide.

Recent Games

mcstorytaller(1924) vs. prezandy(1593) 0-1 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-13, 31 comments by 5 players)

krmchess(2137) vs. mcstorytaller(1912) 0-1 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-12, 24 comments by 2 players)

plebusan(1955) vs. spudweb(2121) 1/2-1/2 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-12, 51 comments by 10 players)

blore(2066) vs. sircmp(1914) 1-0 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-09, 167 comments by 13 players)

txbeda(2171) vs. hastudent(2021) 1/2-1/2 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-09, 22 comments by 4 players)

brunftbert(1798) vs. lno(1886) 0-1 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-09, 6 comments by 2 players)

Subscribe to the recent games feed