civilis(1861) vs. powerless(1837) 0-1
Login to get PGN standard 45+45, 2016-05-24
1.e4 (0:00) e5 (0:00) 2.Nf3 (0:14) Nf6 (1:06)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Try convert to 4 knights scotch maybe. 3.Nxe5 (0:43) d6 (0:06) 4.Nf3 (0:34)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Actually what am I saying, a draw wins the match. 4...Nxe4 (0:04) 5.d4 (0:43) d5 (0:36) 6.Bd3 (0:35) Nc6 (0:49) 7.O-O (0:30) Be7 (0:55) 8.Nc3 (0:31)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Maybe because of how I play vs French/Caro/etc., I might have preferred c4
herrahuu(1815) whispers: i guess it is another way to contest e4
herrahuu(1815) whispers: from the flank
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Hi herrahuu. Just checking TL forum, see you posted a video. Watching it now. :) 8...f5 (2:25)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Interesting, is f5 within theory for Petroff? I have never seen this black structure before, really. 9.Ne2 (0:54)
herrahuu(1815) whispers: maybe it is improvisation
herrahuu(1815) whispers: maybe white has your idea 9...O-O (2:42) 10.c4 (0:31)
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: Go Civilis
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Hey RF
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: :)
mcstorytaller(1829) whispers: RF!
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: MC! 10...Nb4 (3:07) 11.Nf4 (0:33) c6 (1:00)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Quite a journey for the knight
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Can preserve the bishop pair but costing a tempo. Probably best though. 12.Be2 (0:57) Na6 (5:36)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: cxd cxd Bxa6 bxa6 Ne5/Qc2 type setup looks good
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: odd knight position
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: seems natural too 13.Qc2 (4:04) Nc7 (0:24) 14.cxd5 (1:33) Nxd5 (1:02) 15.Nxd5 (0:08) cxd5 (0:02) 16.Bf4 (1:35) Bd7 (0:41) 17.Qb3 (0:51) Bc6 (0:19) 18.Rac1 (1:00) g5 (0:05) 19.Rxc6 (4:06) bxc6 (0:16)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: didn't see this coming 20.Bc1 (0:42) Bd6 (2:17)
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: I wonder what the idea is behind trading rook for bishop there, 21.Rd1 (3:36) Qf6 (5:42) 22.Bd3 (1:27) g4 (0:53)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: maybe was worried about g4, f4 trapping bishop and lost anyway? probably a better defense out there though
Koff(1795) whispers: this looks quite promising for black 23.Bxe4 (2:42) fxe4 (0:35)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: I'd say so
Jammes(1779) whispers: its just over n lost or mate
Jammes(1779) whispers: ok nd2 perhaps not mate
Koff(1795) whispers: Nd2 Bxh2+ might be the way
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: Good try civilis Civilis resigns 0-1
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Try convert to 4 knights scotch maybe. 3.Nxe5 (0:43) d6 (0:06) 4.Nf3 (0:34)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Actually what am I saying, a draw wins the match. 4...Nxe4 (0:04) 5.d4 (0:43) d5 (0:36) 6.Bd3 (0:35) Nc6 (0:49) 7.O-O (0:30) Be7 (0:55) 8.Nc3 (0:31)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Maybe because of how I play vs French/Caro/etc., I might have preferred c4
herrahuu(1815) whispers: i guess it is another way to contest e4
herrahuu(1815) whispers: from the flank
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Hi herrahuu. Just checking TL forum, see you posted a video. Watching it now. :) 8...f5 (2:25)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Interesting, is f5 within theory for Petroff? I have never seen this black structure before, really. 9.Ne2 (0:54)
herrahuu(1815) whispers: maybe it is improvisation
herrahuu(1815) whispers: maybe white has your idea 9...O-O (2:42) 10.c4 (0:31)
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: Go Civilis
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Hey RF
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: :)
mcstorytaller(1829) whispers: RF!
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: MC! 10...Nb4 (3:07) 11.Nf4 (0:33) c6 (1:00)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Quite a journey for the knight
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: Can preserve the bishop pair but costing a tempo. Probably best though. 12.Be2 (0:57) Na6 (5:36)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: cxd cxd Bxa6 bxa6 Ne5/Qc2 type setup looks good
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: odd knight position
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: seems natural too 13.Qc2 (4:04) Nc7 (0:24) 14.cxd5 (1:33) Nxd5 (1:02) 15.Nxd5 (0:08) cxd5 (0:02) 16.Bf4 (1:35) Bd7 (0:41) 17.Qb3 (0:51) Bc6 (0:19) 18.Rac1 (1:00) g5 (0:05) 19.Rxc6 (4:06) bxc6 (0:16)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: didn't see this coming 20.Bc1 (0:42) Bd6 (2:17)
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: I wonder what the idea is behind trading rook for bishop there, 21.Rd1 (3:36) Qf6 (5:42) 22.Bd3 (1:27) g4 (0:53)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: maybe was worried about g4, f4 trapping bishop and lost anyway? probably a better defense out there though
Koff(1795) whispers: this looks quite promising for black 23.Bxe4 (2:42) fxe4 (0:35)
JoshuaR(1854) whispers: I'd say so
Jammes(1779) whispers: its just over n lost or mate
Jammes(1779) whispers: ok nd2 perhaps not mate
Koff(1795) whispers: Nd2 Bxh2+ might be the way
RobertFrost(1896) whispers: Good try civilis Civilis resigns 0-1
Comments
Login to add commentsSee also:
- instruction how to publish this game on your website
- information what is Watchbot and how to use it
- more games played by civilis
- more games played by powerless
- general game search
No comments so far.