0 ratings, login to rate

zutons(2330) vs. burnage(2290) 1-0

Login to get PGN standard 45+45, 2010-11-16

1.b4 (0:00) Nf6 (0:00) 2.Bb2 (0:14) e6 (0:04) 3.a3 (0:17) d5 (0:16) 4.e3 (2:20) c5 (0:03) 5.bxc5 (1:19) Bxc5 (0:06) 6.c4 (2:28)
mindlin(2033) whispers: small crowd; is this game important? good matchup
6...O-O (3:03) 7.Nf3 (1:47) Bd7 (1:58) 8.cxd5 (2:12) exd5 (1:26) 9.Bxf6 (0:18) Qxf6 (0:13)
mindlin(2033) whispers: why did white trade the bishop? I don't get it
10.Nc3 (5:42)
xivarmy(2012) whispers: planning to play d4 in the near future possibly and didn't want to seal it in the coffin?
10...Bc6 (1:48) 11.Bb5 (2:15)
xivarmy(2012) whispers: like now :) would've expected black to play Nc6 instead of Bc6 to finish development. a black d4 was also interesting to try and take advantage of white not getting out of the kingside
alphafoxtrot(1778) whispers: d4 is still playable though
xivarmy(2012) whispers: for white? yea it is. for black? with the knight still undeveloped i'm not sure black can get compensation fast enough to be worth the sac
alphafoxtrot(1778) whispers: what sac? .. d4 and presumably Bxc6 Nxc6
xivarmy(2012) whispers: well i guess it's not a sac exactly - but all the same, the initiative isn't quite what one would hope for because the rooks are not yet united and the knight can't join in
alphafoxtrot(1778) whispers: in fact black should prevent white's d4 by pre-emting
11...d4 (6:16) 12.Bxc6 (1:05) Nxc6 (0:03) 13.Ne4 (1:24) Qf5 (0:30)
xivarmy(2012) whispers: Nxc5 Qxc5 o-o looks pretty much = i think
14.Nxc5 (1:30) Qxc5 (0:00) 15.O-O (2:08)
lambertdw(1515) whispers: Is the queen side pawn majority a significant advantage?
15...dxe3 (9:51)
xivarmy(2012) whispers: not by itself - if black can gain a lead in development in the middle as well it could be. needs to use threats against white's a-pawn to force white into a passive position to take advantage probably
16.fxe3 (2:30) Rfd8 (0:16)
coolexpert(2018) whispers: zutons is trying to imbalance by fxe3
lambertdw(1515) whispers: #thank you
17.Rb1 (2:05) b6 (1:31) 18.Rc1 (1:15) Qd5 (0:06) 19.Qa4 (1:13) Ne5 (0:52) 20.Nxe5 (0:29) Qxe5 (0:00) 21.Qc6 (2:36) h6 (0:28)
xivarmy(2012) whispers: Qb7 followed by Rc7 seems appealing
22.Rc3 (1:53) Qd5 (0:22) 23.Qxd5 (1:12) Rxd5 (0:00) 24.d4 (3:05) Re8 (0:18) 25.g4 (1:04) f6 (0:42) 26.Kg2 (1:27) Kf7 (0:34) 27.h3 (0:45) Re7 (0:18) 28.Kf3 (0:43) g6 (2:21)
coolexpert(2018) whispers: probably a good plan would be lock down the kingside and then try to push the queenside pawns forward. i am not sure but g5 might be worth trying
29.Rc6 (1:22) Re6 (0:32) 30.Rc8 (1:31) Re7 (0:27) 31.Rfc1 (1:24) f5 (1:57) 32.R1c3 (1:23) Ra5 (2:45) 33.Kg3 (0:14) Rd5 (4:12) 34.R3c7 (1:19) fxg4 (0:23) 35.hxg4 (1:43) Ra5 (1:24) 36.Rc3 (0:56) h5 (0:08) 37.gxh5 (1:10) Rg5+ (0:07) 38.Kh4 (1:09) Rxh5+ (0:16) 39.Kg4 (1:01) Re4+ (0:07) 40.Kg3 (0:21) Re7 (3:25) 41.R8c7 (1:27) Rg5+ (0:09) 42.Kf4 (1:14) Ra5 (0:37) 43.e4 (1:47) g5+ (5:23) 44.Kf3 (0:07) Rxc7 (0:52) 45.Rxc7+ (0:07) Kg6 (0:01) 46.Rc6+ (1:47) Kf7 (3:01) 47.d5 (0:08) Rxa3+ (0:05) 48.Kg4 (0:05) Re3 (6:06) 49.Kf5 (3:10) g4 (2:30)
NakedNous(1918) whispers: hi :)
50.Rc7+ (3:04) Ke8 (1:12) 51.e5 (1:01)
FriarBlues(0) whispers: White's mating net is faster than black's g pawn
51...g3 (4:59)
NakedNous(1918) whispers: so this is it?
52.Ke6 (0:37)
FriarBlues(0) whispers: yep
xivarmy(2012) whispers: Kf8 Rf7+ Kg8 Rf1 and white's d-pawn converts instead?
burnage resigns 1-0

Comments

No comments so far.

Login to add comments

Your session

You are not logged in, so you miss some site functions.
Please login.

See also how to set your password.

Watchbot

See what is WatchBot and how to use it.

Do you like it? Read how can you help.

Quick search

Related Games

dotprecise(1637) vs. sadhaka(1538) 1-0 (standard 15+0, 2011-05-02), 0 comments by 0 players

privateschultz(1719) vs. dotprecise(1726) 1-0 (standard 40+20, 2011-02-18), 0 comments by 0 players

eosvoboda(1409) vs. dotprecise(1685) 0-1 (standard 15+10, 2009-09-19), 0 comments by 0 players

ogopogoman(1482) vs. dotprecise(1675) 0-1 (standard 20+3, 2009-03-02), 0 comments by 0 players

dotprecise(1683) vs. wordspoken(2100) 0-1 (standard 15+0, 2008-08-04), 0 comments by 0 players

playernumberone(1410) vs. dotprecise(1766) 1/2-1/2 (standard 20+0, 2008-05-07), 0 comments by 0 players

See also games by zutons or by burnage.