0 ratings, login to rate

outposter(1855) vs. doubleletter(1715) 1-0

Login to get PGN standard 45+45, 2010-08-06

1.d4 (0:00) Nf6 (0:00) 2.c4 (0:10) e6 (1:19) 3.Nc3 (0:04) Bb4 (0:07) 4.Qc2 (0:04) Nc6 (0:21) 5.a3 (0:15) Bxc3+ (0:04) 6.Qxc3 (0:02) d6 (0:29) 7.Bg5 (0:11)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: hmm, this line seems a bit superficial
7...h6 (0:35) 8.Bh4 (0:06)
maeck(1899) whispers: this looks good for black
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: dunno about that
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: fun or no fun?
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: the idea would be to follow with e5, but what about d5 Ne7 BXf6 now?
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: ah, pondering g5, no doubt
maeck(1899) whispers: i dont think Bg5 fits in well here
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: well you probably know better than me, being an ex-tangoist
maeck(1899) whispers: i'm still a Tangoist
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: I just hate these openings where you trade-off one bishop, and then make the other bishop 'good'
maeck(1899) whispers: also, this is rather a Nimzo
maeck(1899) whispers: well i love exactly that part:)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: seems very simplistic to a Francophile like me ;)
maeck(1899) whispers: it's a clear and simple plan
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: if I believed in the orthodoxy about 'bad bishops', my whole opening approach would come into question ;)
maeck(1899) whispers: well i don t believe in that either. in some openings i dont mind a bad bishop. but if there is a clear plan in the position to play for a good bishop, why not take it up
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: ah, I'm a fool
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: e5 d5 Nd4 is possible
8...g5 (4:56) 9.Bg3 (0:29)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: well Ne4 now gets the bishop back
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: and black has a lead in development, but a slightly loose kingside
9...Ne4 (1:40) 10.Qd3 (1:36)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: I wonder if f5 is playable here
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: I guess f5 e3 is fine for white though
10...f5 (1:19)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: well, full points for audacity!
11.f3 (1:13)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: seems to have paid off too
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: Nxg3 hxg3 Qf6 e3 Bd7 and black has no complaints
11...Nxg3 (2:11) 12.hxg3 (0:11) Qf6 (1:18)
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: 0-0-0 ?
13.O-O-O (2:05)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: ah yes, this is better than e3
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: still pretty equal I think, after Bd7 and 0-0-0
13...Bd7 (0:59) 14.e3 (5:03) O-O-O (1:09)
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: two timing this game and chatting with 2 girls
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: I guess that explains my rating
15.Ne2 (1:08) e5 (0:58) 16.d5 (1:27) Nb8 (2:23)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: going to c5, eh
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: so b4 seems indicated, sooner or later
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: ah, but b4 can be answered by e4
maeck(1899) whispers: yes
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: hmm, then Qd4 though
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: this is my problem with 'simple chess': it seems to result in equality
maeck(1899) whispers: hardly
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: I guess white is a bit stuck for a useful move
17.Nc3 (3:02)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: and now Na6 b4 e4 does seem to work
17...f4 (1:31)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: giving up e4?
maeck(1899) whispers: he s going the simple route again:)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: I don't follow this
maeck(1899) whispers: Ne4 Qg6
18.Ne4 (1:17)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: well ok, but what does that achieve?
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: just a 'better bishop'?
18...Qg6 (0:28)
maeck(1899) whispers: that is "something"
maeck(1899) whispers: and without any complications
nemotyro(1679) whispers: The queen goes here, doesn't it?
nemotyro(1679) whispers: No
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: I don't like giving myself a better bishop by giving the opponent a better knight at the same time
maeck(1899) whispers: Bf5 to come
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: white has time for Qd2 and Bd3 though
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: gxf4 to get rid of doubled g pawn
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: nah
19.g4 (1:38)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: g3 isn't an exploitable weakness, but if gxf4 gxf4 then g2 is one
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: though just Qd2 there, so maybe it doesn't matter
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: but g4 looks good
19...h5 (0:57)
maeck(1899) whispers: so does g5
maeck(1899) whispers: Dub is playing my moves
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: only there's a problem
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: gxh5 Rxh5 NXd6+
maeck(1899) whispers: hm right
maeck(1899) whispers: yes, saw that now
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: maybe gxh5 Qf7 though
maeck(1899) whispers: well doesnt matter
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: and round up the h5 pawn later
maeck(1899) whispers: so maybe Rh7 first and Rdh8 was better
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: also Bf5 becomes possible again
maeck(1899) whispers: lets hope he sees that Nxd6 threat at all
maeck(1899) whispers: i have my doubts
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: the problem is that gxh5 is natural here
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: whether white sees the idea or not
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: Qf7 and g5 pawn hangs
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: not good then
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: gxh5 Qg7 is all that's left
20.gxh5 (4:21) Rxh5 (0:13)
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: Nxd6+
21.Nxd6+ (1:34)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: oh well
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: he sees it
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: oh shit
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: 1 0
21...Qxd6 (0:22) 22.Rxh5 (0:12)
smallblackcat(2029) whispers: well you can stop watching then
22...g4 (0:30)
maeck(1899) whispers: oh dear
maeck(1899) whispers: well it's just an exchange :P
23.Qc3 (3:39) gxf3 (0:57) 24.gxf3 (0:13) Ba4 (1:11)
maeck(1899) whispers: e4 might have been a better try
25.Rd2 (1:44) Nd7 (2:12)
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: B at a5 looks trapped
26.e4 (3:27) Re8 (2:04) 27.Rdh2 (1:00) Nc5 (2:24) 28.Rh8 (4:21) Nb3+ (0:29)
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: Qxb3!
29.Kb1 (0:31) Qe7 (0:08)
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: damn slip
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: not a bad move in retrospect
30.R2h7 (1:05)
lingzhi(1917) whispers: 30. Qb4!
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: damn
lingzhi(1917) whispers: Qd8
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: Qd8 Qxe5!
lingzhi(1917) whispers: Rxe5 Rxd8+ Kxd8 -+
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: there is Bh3+
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: oh my
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: I might have an idea lol
lingzhi(1917) whispers: after Bh3+ Bd7
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: Bxd7+ and Q is pinned
30...Rxh8 (3:49)
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: I am awesome - not
lingzhi(1917) whispers: Bh3+ wins
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: RxQ Rh1!! then Q protects and RxB, with Nd2+ fork
31.Rxe7 (1:32)
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: or I get R+B for Q
31...Rh1 (0:05)
lingzhi(1917) whispers: Kc2
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: could still be insufficient
32.Rxc7+ (8:11) Kxc7 (2:31) 33.Qxe5+ (0:10)
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: white gets a let off now
33...Kc8 (1:46)
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: hmm maybe nothing more than a perpetual
34.Kc2 (2:46) Nc5+ (1:40) 35.Kc3 (0:39)
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: b3!
35...Rxf1 (0:45) 36.Qxf4 (1:09) b6 (2:07) 37.b4 (1:20)
alphafoxtrot(1766) whispers: one of these pawns must promote
37...Nd7 (0:25) 38.e5 (1:06) Re1 (1:14) 39.e6 (0:26) Ne5 (0:18) 40.e7 (1:29) Be8 (0:16) 41.Kd2 (3:02) Kd7 (1:33) 42.Qf5+ (0:41) Kd6 (1:52) 43.Kxe1 (0:11) Nxc4 (0:09)
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: :(
44.Qe6+ (0:38) Kc7 (0:12) 45.f4 (1:44) Nd6 (1:40) 46.f5 (1:15) Bd7 (0:41) 47.f6 (0:22) Be8 (1:03)
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: nice one!
48.Ke2 (1:33) Bf7 (0:29)
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: uh-oh
Doubleletter(1715) whispers: QxB :(
49.Qxf7 (0:43) Doubleletter resigns 1-0

Comments

No comments so far.

Login to add comments

Your session

You are not logged in, so you miss some site functions.
Please login.

See also how to set your password.

Watchbot

See what is WatchBot and how to use it.

Do you like it? Read how can you help.

Quick search

Related games

Loading....

See also games by outposter or by doubleletter.

Recent Games

krmchess(2047) vs. araszek(1962) 1-0 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-22, 38 comments by 3 players)

krmchess(2077) vs. fente(1989) 0-1 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-21, 14 comments by 3 players)

introspection(1844) vs. harishjan(1776) 1-0 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-20, 58 comments by 2 players)

introspection(1856) vs. sircmp(1919) 0-1 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-19, 7 comments by 3 players)

pchesso(1996) vs. araszek(1954) 1-0 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-18, 7 comments by 3 players)

jarongroffe(1774) vs. ramund(1883) 0-1 (standard 45+45, 2025-03-17, 6 comments by 3 players)

Subscribe to the recent games feed