0 ratings, login to rate

jakobmankel(1944) vs. brigadoon(2000) 1/2-1/2

Login to get PGN standard 45+45, 2009-10-04

1.d4 (0:00) Nf6 (0:00) 2.Nf3 (0:12) e6 (0:07) 3.Bg5 (0:10) h6 (0:32) 4.Bxf6 (1:26) Qxf6 (0:17) 5.e4 (0:28) d5 (4:15)
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: e5 now looks good
maeck(2020) whispers: e5 is the normal move here, yes
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: e5 Bd3 c3 Nd2 and white has a fairly free hand on the kingside
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: its like a French where white has the luxury of playing c3 and Bd3
maeck(2020) whispers: i can't even remember exactly what i am playing as black against this line, but it doesn't include d5
6.Nbd2 (4:17)
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: c5 now maybe
Jammes(1940) whispers: this looks normal too imo
maeck(2020) whispers: not sure, i would like dxe Nxe4 Qd8 as black here
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: then its like a Burn variation
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: of the French
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: except black is down a tempo
Jammes(1940) whispers: what is the advantage of the burn variation? the bishop pair? seems to lose some tempi
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: down two tempi in fact, because of h6
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: yes in the Burn black gets the two bishops, but white has some initiative
maeck(2020) whispers: the more tempi you are down, the better the Burn variations gets :P
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: well h6 is probably a move you dont want in such a position
Jammes(1940) whispers: ok, i only know rubinstein, what i play from time to time
6...Qd8 (5:26)
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: the Burn is an improved Rubinstein!
maeck(2020) whispers: love the move
Jammes(1940) whispers: rubinstein is quite solid. who other than you does say that :)
maeck(2020) whispers: i'm with cat
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: well admittedly I lost to it the other day
maeck(2020) whispers: full disclosure: he's my captain, so that's to be expected
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: haha
7.Bd3 (2:08)
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: fat chance
7...c5 (0:51)
Jammes(1940) whispers: here white seems to have a chance for an isolatated pawn position. dont knoe if its good
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: well now its like a French Tarrasch line, but again several tempi down
Jammes(1940) whispers: but i think i would play exd now anyway
8.exd5 (3:22)
Jammes(1940) whispers: tarrasch line is with a knight on e7 mostly.
8...Qxd5 (0:05)
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: oh yes I keep forgetting that theres no Bc1 for white
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: maybe that makes this playable for black
Jammes(1940) whispers: black lost so many tempo, white has to have some advantage here
brigadoon(2000) whispers: If I can survive and develop my pieces, I should have a good game. But it is a big IF!
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: castling should be fine here
9.Be4 (4:59) Qd8 (5:32)
Jammes(1940) whispers: im not sure about be4. was a good developing square for the knight. does that create any threats
Jammes(1940) whispers: qe2 perhaps
smallblackcat(2046) whispers: Qe2 and 0-0-0 would be quite aggressive
10.c3 (3:30)
Jammes(1940) whispers: ok c3 says he want 0-0 ;)
10...Be7 (2:53) 11.Qe2 (5:32) O-O (0:07) 12.Rd1 (2:20) Qc7 (2:37) 13.O-O (0:49) cxd4 (0:16) 14.Nxd4 (0:15) Bd7 (9:02) 15.Rfe1 (2:23) a6 (0:09)
Jammes(1940) whispers: this docmatc
Jammes(1940) whispers: ic style black plays has to be punished :)
Jammes(1940) whispers: go jacob, go
16.N2f3 (2:04) Bf6 (3:29) 17.Bc2 (3:02) Nc6 (4:41) 18.Qd3 (3:04) g6 (0:04) 19.Nf5 (0:57) exf5 (2:36) 20.Qxd7 (0:03) Qb6 (0:01) 21.Qd6 (0:54) Kg7 (0:32) 22.Bb3 (0:48) Rad8 (1:07) 23.Qg3 (0:18) Rxd1 (2:16) 24.Rxd1 (0:11) Rd8 (0:02) brigadoon offers a draw. Game drawn by mutual agreement 1/2-1/2

Comments

No comments so far.

Login to add comments

Your session

You are not logged in, so you miss some site functions.
Please login.

See also how to set your password.

Watchbot

See what is WatchBot and how to use it.

Do you like it? Read how can you help.

Quick search

Related Games

litmus(2044) vs. viboranegra(1858) * (standard 15+3, 2010-11-17), 0 comments by 0 players

viboranegra(1862) vs. litmus(2040) 0-1 (standard 15+3, 2010-11-16), 0 comments by 0 players

laotzi(1994) vs. viboranegra(1867) 1-0 (standard 15+3, 2010-11-16), 0 comments by 0 players

redwinger(1946) vs. viboranegra(1873) 1-0 (standard 15+3, 2010-11-16), 0 comments by 0 players

viboranegra(1878) vs. fdog(2025) 0-1 (standard 15+3, 2010-11-16), 0 comments by 0 players

cheer(2127) vs. viboranegra(1881) 1-0 (standard 15+3, 2010-11-06), 5 comments by 1 players

See also games by jakobmankel or by brigadoon.