0 ratings, login to rate

burnage(2132) vs. frac(2163) 0-1

Login to get PGN standard 45+45, 2008-11-02

1.e4 (0:00) e5 (0:00) 2.Nf3 (0:03) Nc6 (0:03) 3.Bc4 (0:01) Nf6 (0:02) 4.Ng5 (0:02) d5 (0:02) 5.exd5 (0:00) Na5 (0:01) 6.Bb5+ (0:01) c6 (0:01) 7.dxc6 (0:01) bxc6 (0:01) 8.Qf3 (0:02) Qc7 (1:09) 9.Bd3 (0:13)
burnage(2132) whispers: a little early to be out book if you're playing this theoretical line..
9...Bg4 (3:03) 10.Qg3 (1:11) h5 (1:09)
NatIN(1839) whispers: complicated variation
11.Nc3 (3:19) h4 (1:00) 12.Qe3 (0:03)
burnage(2132) whispers: I play this system routinely as black and Bg4 is not book... I don't understand black's plan. where is the compensation for the pawn?
12...Be7 (2:11) 13.h3 (0:25) Bh5 (0:25) 14.O-O (0:51)
NatIN(1839) whispers: blacks position looks like a total mess
14...Nd7 (1:29) 15.Nf3 (2:18) O-O (0:47) 16.b4 (0:49) Nb7 (0:06) 17.Bb2 (2:19) f5 (0:57) 18.Na4 (1:40) Rae8 (0:50)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: black looks awkward but i don't see a way to expliot it off hand
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: isng5 safe? if ng5 f4? qe4
19.Bc4+ (9:34) Kh8 (0:05) 20.Nxe5 (6:05) Bf6 (0:24) 21.f4 (4:55) Nd6 (1:57) 22.Be2 (2:08) Bf7 (2:21) 23.Bf3 (3:58) Bxe5 (4:04) 24.fxe5 (0:39) Nc4 (0:28) 25.Qg5 (0:34) Nxb2 (0:33) 26.Qxh4+ (0:02) Kg8 (0:04) 27.Nxb2 (0:23) Nxe5 (3:02) 28.Kh1 (3:13) Nxf3 (0:45) 29.Rxf3 (0:02) Bd5 (0:30) 30.Rf2 (0:19) Re4 (1:21) 31.Qg5 (0:48) Qe5 (0:13) 32.c3 (0:58) Re1+ (0:51) 33.Rf1 (0:02)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: wow just got back... black is looking OK or better now
Plebusan(1840) whispers: what is black threatening here, I just see white being 2 pawns up
33...Rxa1 (2:52)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: white can't really move
34.Rxa1 (0:09)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: f4 g3
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: f4 f3 f2
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: after Q moves
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: has some play for the pawns
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: Qe2 here?
KiranY(2062) whispers: not much
34...Qe2 (1:44)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: sounds like everyone perfers white
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: can't really disagree
Plebusan(1840) whispers: well, I like material to much
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: i get into trouble for the other reason (pawns)
35.c4 (2:07)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: he has to trade b for N be4 d3
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: returning a pawn
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: i'd take here to isolate them
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: could be drawish now
Plebusan(1840) whispers: Be4 d3 Qxb2
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: yup
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: then dxd4
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: dxe4
Plebusan(1840) whispers: no, the rook hangs
35...Be4 (3:37)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: ah right
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: super cautions Rg1 here to free the Q too
36.Rg1 (1:06)
Plebusan(1840) whispers: good call
36...f4 (0:22)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: yup the f pawn plan
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: time to kck the bishop
37.d3 (0:27)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: fxg2 is a blank shot w/o the bishop, if file opens Qxg7#
37...f3 (1:03)
Plebusan(1840) whispers: what about dxe f2
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: dxe4 f2...
KiranY(2062) whispers: nice
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: maybe Qg4 here
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: pin the pawn
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: not sure that works
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: nd1
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: hmm
38.Qe5 (2:27)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: wow
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: f2 wins?
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: no perpetual
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: be4
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: what can white do if f2 here he loses a rook?
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: an exchange
38...f2 (3:24) 39.dxe4 (0:10)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: oh
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: no time
39...fxg1=Q+ (0:23) 40.Kxg1 (0:00)
Plebusan(1840) whispers: no time? he has 20 min
Plebusan(1840) whispers: but I guess he solved it to a draw
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: oh i meant to take the bishop
Plebusan(1840) whispers: taking teh bishop gives him the perp I guess
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: hmm
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: say rf2 no checks after kh7
Plebusan(1840) whispers: ah
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: Qe2 guards h5!
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: rf2 and it's over
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: Rf2 guards f5+
Plebusan(1840) whispers: he should have used his 20 minutes before he went for this
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: i guess ithat's happened to both our teams today
40...Rf1+ (2:42) 41.Kh2 (0:02) Rf2 (0:17)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: that's it
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: i suppose the moral is think again when you say "i think i see a perpetual"
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: but again even if Qg4 before i think black is better
42.Qg5 (4:28) Qxb2 (0:28) 43.b5 (0:02)
mrundersun(2017) whispers: too bad yokke trusted his opponent
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: it all came down to that game as it turned out
Plebusan(1840) whispers: ?
Plebusan(1840) whispers: trusted the opponent, what does that mean?
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: match
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: after this game it will be 2.5 to 1.5
mrundersun(2017) whispers: bobhill made a combination starting with Bxd5
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: looked good at 1st sight
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: but black had great compensation
mrundersun(2017) whispers: yokke should have grabbed the sac
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: down the exchange but he may be better due to white's bad king and very weak light sqaures
mrundersun(2017) whispers: in the end he is up on material
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: wow so it was really a blunder for white
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: boards 2 and 4 split games
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: or board 1 and 4
43...Qf6 (5:34) 44.Qg3 (0:31) c5 (0:45) 45.a4 (1:04) Qf4 (1:34)
StrokerAce(1915) whispers: good comeback by frac
Shazbat(1676) whispers: I think they backed up a few moves, as White was down to just a rook and a king earlier
bobhill(1912) whispers: not sure I blundered, will take more detailed analysis, but taking the sac was better for black
burnage resigns 0-1

Comments

No comments so far.

Login to add comments

Your session

You are not logged in, so you miss some site functions.
Please login.

See also how to set your password.

Watchbot

See what is WatchBot and how to use it.

Do you like it? Read how can you help.

Quick search

Related Games

desyvfjell(1704) vs. klikkliak(1702) 1-0 (standard 15+0, 2008-08-05), 0 comments by 0 players

desyvfjell(1705) vs. klikkliak(1701) 1-0 (standard 15+0, 2008-08-05), 0 comments by 0 players

klikkliak(1692) vs. desyvfjell(1721) 1-0 (standard 15+0, 2008-08-05), 0 comments by 0 players

See also games by burnage or by frac.

Recent Games

introspection(1808) vs. mcstorytaller(1961) 1-0 (standard 45+45, 2025-01-12, 37 comments by 4 players)

introspection(1813) vs. sircmp(1954) 0-1 (standard 45+45, 2025-01-07, 11 comments by 2 players)

lno(1944) vs. introspection(1816) 1-0 (standard 45+45, 2025-01-04, 7 comments by 3 players)

introspection(1823) vs. plebusan(1939) 1/2-1/2 (standard 45+45, 2024-12-29, 13 comments by 5 players)

hathkhola(1840) vs. lno(1963) 1-0 (standard 45+45, 2024-12-28, 30 comments by 2 players)

sircmp(1962) vs. introspection(1825) 1-0 (standard 45+45, 2024-12-27, 4 comments by 2 players)

Subscribe to the recent games feed